Difference between revisions of "Talk:FF7/Kernel/Kernel.bin"
< Talk:FF7
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Qhimm>Qhimm |
Qhimm>Qhimm m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Detaching parts of the contents is a good idea IMO, especially in such a "modular" case where the kernel.bin format is completely explained in another article (about what uses the file). This article can be easily rewritten to a short reference to [[FF7/Kernel.bin]], or even use wiki code to include the latter in the former. I think the linking solution is preferable, though. | :Detaching parts of the contents is a good idea IMO, especially in such a "modular" case where the kernel.bin format is completely explained in another article (about what uses the file). This article can be easily rewritten to a short reference to [[FF7/Kernel.bin]], or even use wiki code to include the latter in the former. I think the linking solution is preferable, though. Edit: In fact I think the descriptions on the various blocks och kernel.bin can be split into articles as well, especially since these are direct memory dumps (i.e. they will be referred to by their own right from other articles). --[[User:Qhimm|Qhimm]] 10:10, 9 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 9 March 2005
Detaching the tables?
Somethings been bugging me. You think we should "Detach" the KERNEL.BIN format and place it as it's own article ala the TIM example? This will allow 1)The search function be able to pick up "kernel.bin" and return a intelligent response, and also 2) Keeps a particular article from being overloaded with tables. We can check to see if anything's been orphaned using the special pages. I think we should do this for things like the savemap as well, or any global resource that gets frequently refrenced.
Another issue is my html export of Gears uses tags, which this wiki does not parse. How do you remove these in a quick manner to make these tables?--Halkun 22:50, 8 Mar 2005 (CST)
- I've finished this section and just looking at the length of the tables it might be a good idea to somehow break it up, not just from a stylistic point of view but when I edit it the Wiki tells me that since the article is more than 32KB there may be some browsers that cannot edit it. I don't know if these are just older browsers since IE6 and Firefox 1.0 don't seem to have any issues.
- About the tables, if you want me to go over them and format them in the Wiki's native table format so that it's easier to edit, I can do that, or if you want, take a look at the formatting for the tables on this page I've done and apply them to tables elsewhere (or copy/paste/edit if it's easier). --SB 06:22, 9 Mar 2005 (CST)
- Detaching parts of the contents is a good idea IMO, especially in such a "modular" case where the kernel.bin format is completely explained in another article (about what uses the file). This article can be easily rewritten to a short reference to FF7/Kernel.bin, or even use wiki code to include the latter in the former. I think the linking solution is preferable, though. Edit: In fact I think the descriptions on the various blocks och kernel.bin can be split into articles as well, especially since these are direct memory dumps (i.e. they will be referred to by their own right from other articles). --Qhimm 10:10, 9 Mar 2005 (CST)